11 August 2014
Source: Middle East Monitor
Egyptian commentators and former politicians have welcomed the
electoral victory of outgoing Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyib
Erdogan on Sunday.
Former advisor to the ousted president Mohamed Morsi and political
scientist Dr Seif Abdel-Fattah welcomed the victory in a congratulatory
note on Facebook, while former minister of investment under Morsi, Yehia
Hamed, congratulated Erdogan, haling his "persistence in supporting
causes of liberty and democracy and standing against oppressive
regimes."
Human right activist Haitham Abu Khalil hailed the "principled
competition" between Erdogan and his rival candidates, as the
opposition's candidate Ekmelettin Ihsanoglu congratulated Erdogan for
his victory.
Similarly, political activist and Coptic youth leader Rami Jan
congratulated Erdogan and the Turkish people. "Erdogan, this unique man
has changed the political system in Turkey for good," he said on
Facebook.
Link:
www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/africa/13385-erdogans-victory-welcomed-in-egypt.
A blog which includes a variety of different topics in which I am interested. Most of the posts are from articles from different websites. This blog includes: politics, health, Islam, economics, etc.
Showing posts with label Erdogan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Erdogan. Show all posts
Monday, August 11, 2014
Wednesday, July 23, 2014
Turkey's Erdogan condemns Israel over Gaza
07.18.14
By SUZAN FRASER
Associated Press
Source:Miami Herald
ANKARA, Turkey -- Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan intensified his fiery rhetoric against Israel over its ground invasion of Gaza on Friday, accusing the country of state terrorism and genocide and saying the two countries will not mend ties on his watch.
Earlier, hundreds of protesters pelted the top Israeli diplomat's residence in Ankara with stones, and the private Dogan news agency said police in Istanbul used tear gas and water cannon to disperse protesters trying to enter the Israeli Consulate grounds. Turkish legislators leaving a late-night debate in parliament also protested against Israel.
Turkey
intensified security around Israeli missions but the demonstrations
prompted Israel to call home the families of Israeli diplomats and to
keep staff in the embassy and consulate to a minimum.
Tzachi Moshe, a spokesman for Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, said Israel "sharply protested the flagrant violation of diplomatic rules."
Erdogan told reporters after Muslim Friday prayers: "Israel threatens world peace. Israel threatens peace in the Middle East. Therefore, I personally, can never contemplate anything positive with Israel as long as I remain on duty."
"Israel is at the moment waging terrorism; Israel at the moment is carrying out genocide," he said.
Turkey and Israel had been working toward improving ties that were soured after Israeli commandos stormed a pro-Palestinian aid ship in 2010, killing eight Turks and one Turkish-American. Turkey expelled the Israeli ambassador and recalled its own top envoy following the incident.
Israel apologized to Turkey for the deaths and agreed to pay compensation under a U.S.-brokered arrangement in 2013. Turkish officials said in March the sides were close to reaching a compensation deal that would lead to a restoration of ties.
U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the department believes Erdogan's statements are "offensive and wrong."
"And, of course, this kind of provocative rhetoric is unhelpful and distracts from urgent efforts to bring about a cease-fire," she said.
Tzachi Moshe, a spokesman for Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, said Israel "sharply protested the flagrant violation of diplomatic rules."
Erdogan told reporters after Muslim Friday prayers: "Israel threatens world peace. Israel threatens peace in the Middle East. Therefore, I personally, can never contemplate anything positive with Israel as long as I remain on duty."
"Israel is at the moment waging terrorism; Israel at the moment is carrying out genocide," he said.
Turkey and Israel had been working toward improving ties that were soured after Israeli commandos stormed a pro-Palestinian aid ship in 2010, killing eight Turks and one Turkish-American. Turkey expelled the Israeli ambassador and recalled its own top envoy following the incident.
Israel apologized to Turkey for the deaths and agreed to pay compensation under a U.S.-brokered arrangement in 2013. Turkish officials said in March the sides were close to reaching a compensation deal that would lead to a restoration of ties.
U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the department believes Erdogan's statements are "offensive and wrong."
"And, of course, this kind of provocative rhetoric is unhelpful and distracts from urgent efforts to bring about a cease-fire," she said.
Tia Goldenberg in Jerusalem and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/07/18/4242388/turkeys-erdogan-condemns-israel.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/07/18/4242388/turkeys-erdogan-condemns-
By SUZAN FRASER
Asso
By SUZAN FRASER
Associated Press
By SUZAN FRASER
Associated Press
ciated Press
israel.html#storylink=cpySaturday, June 28, 2014
Erdogan criticises Gul for congratulating Al-Sisi: We do not congratulate coups
27 June 2014
Source: Middle East Monitor
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has criticised his country's president, Abdullah Gul, in front of EU ambassadors in Turkey.
The criticism came during a meeting between Erdogan and EU ambassadors over dinner, when Erdogan criticised Gul's congratulations for Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi, the leader of the recent coup in Egypt, upon his assumption of the post of the presidency. Jordan' s As-Sabeel newspaper quoted Erdogan as saying: "I must be honest, this congratulations to me holds no meaning, because it is not possible to offer congratulations to a coup leader."
Erdogan said that Egypt still plays a pivotal role in the future of the Middle East, expressing his wishes for Egypt and its people to enjoy actual democracy and stressing that his government's attitude towards Egypt stems from this point.
He added that Egypt's legitimate president, Mohamad Morsi, who came to power after winning a popular election with 54 per cent of the vote, was deliberately isolated to allow the army to bring about a military coup against a democratically elected government.
Erdogan stressed that the Turkish position has not changed on the issue of Egypt, and he criticised those countries that are avoiding calling what happened in Egypt a coup and accepting what he called the recent non-transparent sham of an election.
Link: www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/europe/12400-erdogan-criticises-gul-for-congratulating-al-sisi-we-do-not-congratulate-coups.
Source: Middle East Monitor
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has criticised his country's president, Abdullah Gul, in front of EU ambassadors in Turkey.
The criticism came during a meeting between Erdogan and EU ambassadors over dinner, when Erdogan criticised Gul's congratulations for Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi, the leader of the recent coup in Egypt, upon his assumption of the post of the presidency. Jordan' s As-Sabeel newspaper quoted Erdogan as saying: "I must be honest, this congratulations to me holds no meaning, because it is not possible to offer congratulations to a coup leader."
Erdogan said that Egypt still plays a pivotal role in the future of the Middle East, expressing his wishes for Egypt and its people to enjoy actual democracy and stressing that his government's attitude towards Egypt stems from this point.
He added that Egypt's legitimate president, Mohamad Morsi, who came to power after winning a popular election with 54 per cent of the vote, was deliberately isolated to allow the army to bring about a military coup against a democratically elected government.
Erdogan stressed that the Turkish position has not changed on the issue of Egypt, and he criticised those countries that are avoiding calling what happened in Egypt a coup and accepting what he called the recent non-transparent sham of an election.
Link: www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/europe/12400-erdogan-criticises-gul-for-congratulating-al-sisi-we-do-not-congratulate-coups.
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
Turkey's Erdogan vows to 'liquidate' treachery at home and abroad
April 8, 2014
By Jonny Hogg and Gulsen Solaker
Source: Yahoo News
Erdogan's Islamist-rooted AK Party relied on Hizmet to
break the grip on politics of the army, which carried out three coups
between 1960 and 1980 and forced an Islamist-led government from power
in 1997. But he now casts the fight with Hizmet as a continuation of
that struggle against tutelage in any form, the final chapter in a
battle for democracy and justice.
PRESIDENTIAL AMBITION
Erdogan has made little secret of his ambition to take up a powerful presidency, but such is his determination to finish the battle with Gulen that it remains unclear whether he will run in the first direct elections for the post in August.
By Jonny Hogg and Gulsen Solaker
Source: Yahoo News
ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkish Prime
Minister Tayyip Erdogan said on Tuesday local elections had given him a
mandate to "liquidate" the enemies he sees as contriving a corruption
scandal and would go after their international activities and sources of
funding.
In his first
parliamentary speech since his ruling AK Party dominated March 30
municipal polls, Erdogan said "traitors" responsible for a stream of
graft allegations and the illegal tapping of thousands of phones would
be brought to account.
Erdogan accuses Islamic cleric Fethullah Gulen, a former ally now based
in the United States, of orchestrating the graft scandal to undermine
him. Gulen's Hizmet network claims millions of followers and holds
influence in the police and judiciary.
Erdogan has accused the movement of running a "parallel state", spying
on thousands of government officials over years and leaking manipulated
recordings in a bid to unseat him ahead of last month's elections.
"March 30 is the day when the page was turned on tutelage, when the
monuments of hubris were felled, and the privileges (of an elite) were
lost forever," Erdogan said.
"The nation gave us a mandate for the liquidation of the parallel state.
We will not have the slightest hesitation. We shall never forget the
betrayal," he said.
He said
the government would follow up on what he called the network's
international links and investigate all "illegally collected monies and
donations".
The movement,
also known as Cemaat (JEH-maat), "The Community", has for decades been a
spearhead of Turkish cultural influence and commerce overseas,
especially in the assertive moves into Africa, the Middle East and Asia
in the years after the AK Party took power in 2002.
Cemaat says the Turkish government is already putting pressure on
governments to close down its global network of schools which have been a
major source of influence and revenue. Government officials say Turkish
embassies have stopped backing schools and business linked to Gulen.
Hizmet denies using followers in the police and judiciary to launch a
graft inquiry targeting Erdogan family members, ministers and
businessmen, or any involvement in the illicit recording of top
officials.
"They will answer before the courts. But not in front of their parallel
courts; they will answer before the court of the nation," Erdogan said.
Erdogan has made little secret of his ambition to take up a powerful presidency, but such is his determination to finish the battle with Gulen that it remains unclear whether he will run in the first direct elections for the post in August.
He is barred by AK Party rules from standing for a fourth term as prime
minister, currently a more powerful role than the largely ceremonial
presidency; but the party could amend those rules with relative ease if
it feels his leadership is needed to see out the feud with Gulen, senior
officials have said.
Erdogan
would seek to shape the presidency as a more powerful role than that
played by incumbent Abdullah Gul. Erdogan was quoted on Tuesday as
saying the direct election of the next president would automatically
bestow the role with greater powers.
"The responsibilities will be different after these elections. It will
not be a president of protocol, but one that sweats, runs around, works
hard," he was quoted as saying by the pro-government Sabah newspaper.
Until now, Turkey's parliament has elected the head of state. Gul is a
close Erdogan ally and co-founder of the AK Party, tipped as a possible
prime minister if Erdogan were to run for what he would shape as the top
job.
Monday, April 7, 2014
Main Turk opposition loses bid for election recount in Ankara
April 4, 2014
Source: Yahoo News
Since Monday, hundreds of volunteers, mostly students, have been
comparing and recounting votes for CHP after widespread allegations of
irregularities spread on social media.
(Reporting by Gulsen Solaker; Writing by Nick Tattersall; Editing by Dasha Afanasieva/Mark Heinrich)
Source: Yahoo News
ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkey's main
opposition CHP party has lost a bid to force a recount of the results of
Sunday's local election in the capital Ankara, a party source said on
Friday.
Prime Minister Tayyip
Erdogan's Islamist-rooted AK Party largely dominated Turkey's electoral
map in the nationwide communal polls, keeping control of the main
cities including Istanbul and Ankara.
The source said the CHP would appeal the decision against a recount taken by the Ankara election board.
But a reversal of the Ankara result would have been little more than a
consolation prize for the opposition, who failed to dent Erdogan's
support nationally in a vote that became a referendum on his rule as he
battles allegations of corruption.
Erdogan dismisses the allegations as politically motivated. No official
results have been announced, but informal tallies from Turkish news
channels put the AK Party at 45 percent nationwide, compared to 28
percent for the CHP.
In
Ankara, the AK Party's candidate and incumbent Mayor Melih Gokcek
secured 44.6 percent of the votes, narrowly beating CHP nominee Mansur
Yavas on 43.8 percent, according to provisional electoral board results.
(Reporting by Gulsen Solaker; Writing by Nick Tattersall; Editing by Dasha Afanasieva/Mark Heinrich)
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
Turkey PM has boost in apparent local election win
March 31.2014
Source: mail.com
Erdogan was not on the ballot in the countrywide
polls, but he campaigned as if he were. Hours after the polls closed,
Turkish newswires suggested that his party was significantly
outstripping its results of about 39 percent in the last local elections
in 2009 and roundly beating the main opposition party.
With nearly 70 percent of the votes counted, Erdogan's party was above 46 percent of the votes while the main opposition CHP was at just over 30 percent, according to state-run TRT television. "I thank my Lord for granting such a victory, such a meaningful result," Erdogan said at a victory rally in Ankara, speaking to a crowd of supporters who had been chanting, "Turkey is proud of you!"
Incumbent candidates from Erdogan's Justice and Development Party, better known by its Turkish acronym AKP, also were leading in high-profile races in Istanbul and Ankara. Voter turnout appeared to be heavy, with people forming long queues at polling stations.
The strong results were a big boost for the prime minister following a tumultuous corruption scandal. In recent days, Erdogan has also provoked outrage at home and abroad by blocking access to Twitter and YouTube.
Fadi Hakura, a Turkey analyst at London-based independent policy institute Chatham House, said neither corruption issues nor media freedoms determined the elections. "Overall, the people are happy with the government's economic performance," he said.
"His victory speech was uncompromising, tough and polarizing," the analyst added. "It is an indication that he will intensify his current robust style of leadership." The result could embolden Erdogan to run for president in an election scheduled for August. Prior to Sunday's showing, he had appeared to be leaning against that route, which has risks. In a direct vote, he would have to win 50 percent in a country that is deeply polarized over his rule.
Erdogan and his party have dominated Turkish politics over the past decade in a period of great prosperity. The party came to power backed by a pious Muslim base looking for greater standing in a country that had for decades favored a secular elite. But AKP, whose party symbol is a light bulb, has also cultivated an identity of pragmatism and competency.
That image has been damaged by the corruption scandal, with a series of leaked tapes bringing down four ministers with revelations of bribe-taking and cover-ups. One tape allegedly involves Erdogan and family members, but he and his allies have rejected the allegations as a plot orchestrated by followers of U.S.-based Muslim cleric Fethullah Gulen, a former Erdogan ally who has split with him.
Following the results, Erdogan promised retribution against Gulen's movement. "We shall enter into their caves," he said. "They will pay and account for their deeds." In the wake of the scandal, Erdogan has shuffled thousands of police officers and tightened control of the judiciary, which had launched investigations. The moves prompted concern that Erdogan was moving toward more authoritarian rule.
But in his victory speech, Erdogan said that democracy in Turkey is strong. "We have the democracy which the West is longing for," he said.
Source: mail.com
ISTANBUL (AP) — Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan on Sunday hailed what appeared to be a decisive victory for his
party in local elections, providing a boost that could help him emerge
from a spate of recent troubles.
With nearly 70 percent of the votes counted, Erdogan's party was above 46 percent of the votes while the main opposition CHP was at just over 30 percent, according to state-run TRT television. "I thank my Lord for granting such a victory, such a meaningful result," Erdogan said at a victory rally in Ankara, speaking to a crowd of supporters who had been chanting, "Turkey is proud of you!"
Incumbent candidates from Erdogan's Justice and Development Party, better known by its Turkish acronym AKP, also were leading in high-profile races in Istanbul and Ankara. Voter turnout appeared to be heavy, with people forming long queues at polling stations.
The strong results were a big boost for the prime minister following a tumultuous corruption scandal. In recent days, Erdogan has also provoked outrage at home and abroad by blocking access to Twitter and YouTube.
Fadi Hakura, a Turkey analyst at London-based independent policy institute Chatham House, said neither corruption issues nor media freedoms determined the elections. "Overall, the people are happy with the government's economic performance," he said.
"His victory speech was uncompromising, tough and polarizing," the analyst added. "It is an indication that he will intensify his current robust style of leadership." The result could embolden Erdogan to run for president in an election scheduled for August. Prior to Sunday's showing, he had appeared to be leaning against that route, which has risks. In a direct vote, he would have to win 50 percent in a country that is deeply polarized over his rule.
Erdogan and his party have dominated Turkish politics over the past decade in a period of great prosperity. The party came to power backed by a pious Muslim base looking for greater standing in a country that had for decades favored a secular elite. But AKP, whose party symbol is a light bulb, has also cultivated an identity of pragmatism and competency.
That image has been damaged by the corruption scandal, with a series of leaked tapes bringing down four ministers with revelations of bribe-taking and cover-ups. One tape allegedly involves Erdogan and family members, but he and his allies have rejected the allegations as a plot orchestrated by followers of U.S.-based Muslim cleric Fethullah Gulen, a former Erdogan ally who has split with him.
Following the results, Erdogan promised retribution against Gulen's movement. "We shall enter into their caves," he said. "They will pay and account for their deeds." In the wake of the scandal, Erdogan has shuffled thousands of police officers and tightened control of the judiciary, which had launched investigations. The moves prompted concern that Erdogan was moving toward more authoritarian rule.
But in his victory speech, Erdogan said that democracy in Turkey is strong. "We have the democracy which the West is longing for," he said.
Understanding the conflict between the Gulen Movement and the Turkish government
28 March 2014
Furkan Torlak
Source: Middle East Monitor
In the past week, the Washington-based Bipartisan Policy Center published a report titled, "Turkey's Local Election: Actors, Factors, and Implications" signed by Alan Makosky, Eric Edelman and Morton Abramowitz, all known for their poor judgment of Turkey's democratization process.
The report conducted an analysis of Turkey's upcoming local elections through reading basic conflict parameters and tried to explain the elections to American policymakers. The report set forth the following hypothesis: Between 2003 and 2010, the main division dominating Turkish politics was the struggle between the secular and conservative segments of the society. The conservative wing was represented by the Gülen Movement and the AK Party, both based along the lines of the National Vision Movement (MGH) founded by Necmettin Erbakan. The secular strata lost following the 2010 referendum, starting a brand new course in Turkish politics.
According to the report, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan did not fulfill his democratization promises and chose the path of authoritarianism instead. Tensions escalated as a direct result of his ambitions and transformed into a conflict between the Gülen Movement and the government. The local elections came along in this atmosphere and are thought to be the first response to the political turbulence that Turkey entered. The report declares Erdoğan will become more rigid following the local elections and will increase oversight over the system in an effort to protect his dominance.
In a strange kind of way, the report says the only way election results will be considered significant is if the AK Party loses. As it is clearly evident, the report is not patient inasmuch as waiting for the elections. With an explicit bias, the report argues that Erdoğan has become a burden on the conservative Islamic segment of the population.
Primarily, one of the remarkable aspects of the report is that it establishes the Gülen Movement as the main actor, that started the probe on Dec. 17 and revealed the corruption allegations "in accordance with procedures." This depiction on its own seems to verify the existence of a parallel structure within state institutions from an external viewpoint regardless of how "poor" the judgment may be.
However, the report's depiction of the existing political conflict is considerably far from reality. Reducing the struggle that occurred in Turkey between 2003 and 2010 to a conflict between the secularists and conservatives is an allegation that is difficult to defend. In fact, the conflict that took place was a struggle on a much larger scale against the Old Turkey's tutelage regime by a wide segment of conservatives acting in accord with reformist lines toward a New Turkey, along with the block comprised of liberals and Kurdish politicians previously marginalized by the state.
Yes, with the 2010 referendum Turkey reached a juncture whereby the tutelage regime unique to Old Turkey would be left behind. The historical juncture began with a new Constitution and brought into action the reconciliation process as a peace project to resolve the Kurdish issue. It would also bring into action the democratization packages in order to provide cohesion between the state and the nation. The prospect of these expectations increased with the AK Party's decisive victory in the 2011 general elections.
As a matter of fact, the AK Party took initiative to create a new Constitution. Despite having a majority in Parliament, the party adopted an approach that emphasized "reconciliation" and led the establishment of a constitutional commission where all parties would be represented equally. After long discussions, the AK Party proposed the approval of articles reaching an agreement in Parliament. It announced and promulgated the democratization package. Many of the steps that were taken by the party indicated Erdoğan did not diverge from the final destination of democratization.
However, during this new course, the Gülen Movement started to falter. The movement first made a u-turn with regard to the solution of the Kurdish issue, a task taken upon by Prime Minister Erdoğan, who undertook political risks. The movement tried to sabotage the process with the Kurdish Communities Union (KCK) case. The ensuing National Intelligence Agency (MİT) crisis was interpreted as an attempt to hinder the reconciliation process and aimed to sending a warning message to Erdoğan, rather than a personal settlement with [MİT chief] Hakan Fidan, whom they have known since his position as president of TİKA [Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency].
The Gülen Movement also turned a blind eye to the AK Party's efforts regarding constitutional reforms and disdained the democratization packages. It attempted to manipulate through the use of a parallel structure within state institutions granting them significant control. The movement could not break away from the characteristics of the Old Turkey and became a pos- sessor of those characteristics in attempting to shape the new Constitution, determine the fate of politics and be- come a tutelage candidate.
These details stand out, especially when one goes beyond a neoconservative interpretation of the developments in Turkey. Without going beyond this analysis, it is not be possible to understand the reason why the movement did not receive support from conservative circles throughout the conflict with the government or the suspicions of the secular circles and the detached approach to Kurdish politics. So much so that during this process, even other branches of the Nur Movement - from which the Gülen Movement originated - took an opposing stance toward the movement!
The current state of affairs indicates the struggle has become one that brought the government and the movement against each other rather than the prime minister's personal efforts to protect his power. This is clearly evident by the fact that different segments of the society within the bureaucracy have explicitly expressed their support for the prime minister and the government through a notion of protecting the state. A senior bureaucrat who does not identify himself as an AK Party supporter said: "The prime minister of the Turkish Republic can only come to power through elections and leave through elections. All attempts apart from this will find themselves facing the state."
Accordingly, interpreting the current situation as the prime minister's attempts to increase his control over the system as claimed by the report does not seem realistic. In actuality, the current process is one of normalization within different ranks of state institutions and the bureaucracy.
In other words, this is a period to terminate the tutelage of a minority over state institutions, because reform in the bureaucracy is moving toward a resettlement inclusive of National Vision, Islamist, Nur Movement, nationalist, social democrat, liberal, left-wing and Alevi circles. Perhaps the current tensions are steps on the way to the New Turkey.
This article was first published by Daily Sabah
Link: www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/europe/10584-understanding-the-conflict-between-the-gulen-movement-and-the-turkish-government.
Furkan Torlak
Source: Middle East Monitor
In the past week, the Washington-based Bipartisan Policy Center published a report titled, "Turkey's Local Election: Actors, Factors, and Implications" signed by Alan Makosky, Eric Edelman and Morton Abramowitz, all known for their poor judgment of Turkey's democratization process.
The report conducted an analysis of Turkey's upcoming local elections through reading basic conflict parameters and tried to explain the elections to American policymakers. The report set forth the following hypothesis: Between 2003 and 2010, the main division dominating Turkish politics was the struggle between the secular and conservative segments of the society. The conservative wing was represented by the Gülen Movement and the AK Party, both based along the lines of the National Vision Movement (MGH) founded by Necmettin Erbakan. The secular strata lost following the 2010 referendum, starting a brand new course in Turkish politics.
According to the report, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan did not fulfill his democratization promises and chose the path of authoritarianism instead. Tensions escalated as a direct result of his ambitions and transformed into a conflict between the Gülen Movement and the government. The local elections came along in this atmosphere and are thought to be the first response to the political turbulence that Turkey entered. The report declares Erdoğan will become more rigid following the local elections and will increase oversight over the system in an effort to protect his dominance.
In a strange kind of way, the report says the only way election results will be considered significant is if the AK Party loses. As it is clearly evident, the report is not patient inasmuch as waiting for the elections. With an explicit bias, the report argues that Erdoğan has become a burden on the conservative Islamic segment of the population.
Primarily, one of the remarkable aspects of the report is that it establishes the Gülen Movement as the main actor, that started the probe on Dec. 17 and revealed the corruption allegations "in accordance with procedures." This depiction on its own seems to verify the existence of a parallel structure within state institutions from an external viewpoint regardless of how "poor" the judgment may be.
However, the report's depiction of the existing political conflict is considerably far from reality. Reducing the struggle that occurred in Turkey between 2003 and 2010 to a conflict between the secularists and conservatives is an allegation that is difficult to defend. In fact, the conflict that took place was a struggle on a much larger scale against the Old Turkey's tutelage regime by a wide segment of conservatives acting in accord with reformist lines toward a New Turkey, along with the block comprised of liberals and Kurdish politicians previously marginalized by the state.
Yes, with the 2010 referendum Turkey reached a juncture whereby the tutelage regime unique to Old Turkey would be left behind. The historical juncture began with a new Constitution and brought into action the reconciliation process as a peace project to resolve the Kurdish issue. It would also bring into action the democratization packages in order to provide cohesion between the state and the nation. The prospect of these expectations increased with the AK Party's decisive victory in the 2011 general elections.
As a matter of fact, the AK Party took initiative to create a new Constitution. Despite having a majority in Parliament, the party adopted an approach that emphasized "reconciliation" and led the establishment of a constitutional commission where all parties would be represented equally. After long discussions, the AK Party proposed the approval of articles reaching an agreement in Parliament. It announced and promulgated the democratization package. Many of the steps that were taken by the party indicated Erdoğan did not diverge from the final destination of democratization.
However, during this new course, the Gülen Movement started to falter. The movement first made a u-turn with regard to the solution of the Kurdish issue, a task taken upon by Prime Minister Erdoğan, who undertook political risks. The movement tried to sabotage the process with the Kurdish Communities Union (KCK) case. The ensuing National Intelligence Agency (MİT) crisis was interpreted as an attempt to hinder the reconciliation process and aimed to sending a warning message to Erdoğan, rather than a personal settlement with [MİT chief] Hakan Fidan, whom they have known since his position as president of TİKA [Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency].
The Gülen Movement also turned a blind eye to the AK Party's efforts regarding constitutional reforms and disdained the democratization packages. It attempted to manipulate through the use of a parallel structure within state institutions granting them significant control. The movement could not break away from the characteristics of the Old Turkey and became a pos- sessor of those characteristics in attempting to shape the new Constitution, determine the fate of politics and be- come a tutelage candidate.
These details stand out, especially when one goes beyond a neoconservative interpretation of the developments in Turkey. Without going beyond this analysis, it is not be possible to understand the reason why the movement did not receive support from conservative circles throughout the conflict with the government or the suspicions of the secular circles and the detached approach to Kurdish politics. So much so that during this process, even other branches of the Nur Movement - from which the Gülen Movement originated - took an opposing stance toward the movement!
The current state of affairs indicates the struggle has become one that brought the government and the movement against each other rather than the prime minister's personal efforts to protect his power. This is clearly evident by the fact that different segments of the society within the bureaucracy have explicitly expressed their support for the prime minister and the government through a notion of protecting the state. A senior bureaucrat who does not identify himself as an AK Party supporter said: "The prime minister of the Turkish Republic can only come to power through elections and leave through elections. All attempts apart from this will find themselves facing the state."
Accordingly, interpreting the current situation as the prime minister's attempts to increase his control over the system as claimed by the report does not seem realistic. In actuality, the current process is one of normalization within different ranks of state institutions and the bureaucracy.
In other words, this is a period to terminate the tutelage of a minority over state institutions, because reform in the bureaucracy is moving toward a resettlement inclusive of National Vision, Islamist, Nur Movement, nationalist, social democrat, liberal, left-wing and Alevi circles. Perhaps the current tensions are steps on the way to the New Turkey.
Bipartisan Policy Center report
On March 14, 2014, the Bipartisan Policy Center published a report titled, "Turkey's Local Elections: Actors, Factors and Implications." The Washington-based think tank previously published reports on Turkey. This particular report was compiled by Morton Abramowitz and Eric Edelman, former ambassadors of the United States to Turkey. The report mainly claims that the current political situation in Turkey is "highly worrisome" for American interests as the authors claim the country is becoming less reliable and stable, going as far as comparing it to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan simply based on the notion that these countries share Islamic values. The authors disregard the radically different political cultures and economic and social situation in these countries, reducing the judgment to a monolithic rhetoric. Bipartisan Policy Center describes itself as a think tank which "drives principled solutions through rigorous analysis, reasoned negotiation and respectful dialogue" charac- terized by "politically balanced policy making with strong, proactive advocacy and outreach." The Center was founded in 2007 by former Senate Majority Leaders Howard Baker, Tom Daschle, Bob Dole and George J. Mitchell.This article was first published by Daily Sabah
Link: www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/europe/10584-understanding-the-conflict-between-the-gulen-movement-and-the-turkish-government.
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Turkish PM denounces pro-Gulen channel's designation of Palestinian resistance as terrorists
16 March 2014
Source: Middle East Monitor
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan denounced a pro-Gulen channel for framing the Palestinian resistance in Gaza as "terrorists".
In a speech before his supporters in the southern Turkish city of Antalia, Erdogan said he was not surprised at the fact that the Gulen group would label Palestinian resistance as terrorism, since they did so before when their media outlets dismissed the Mavi Marmara's Gaza Freedom Flotilla humanitarian activists as terrorists.
"The results of municipal elections of March 30 will dash the hopes of this group," Erdogan said.
Erdogan slammed the recent phone taping attempts as a crime, vowing to prosecute all those involved, hinting at the "parallel entity" which the government accuses of carrying out these operations.
On Saturday, the Gulen-owned STV channel broadcast a news story which read: "The Israeli Air Defense forces bombed 7 terrorist sites in Gaza."
Link: /www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/europe/10326-turkish-pm-denounces-pro-gulen-channels-designation-of-palestinian-resistance-as-terrorists.
Source: Middle East Monitor
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan denounced a pro-Gulen channel for framing the Palestinian resistance in Gaza as "terrorists".
In a speech before his supporters in the southern Turkish city of Antalia, Erdogan said he was not surprised at the fact that the Gulen group would label Palestinian resistance as terrorism, since they did so before when their media outlets dismissed the Mavi Marmara's Gaza Freedom Flotilla humanitarian activists as terrorists.
"The results of municipal elections of March 30 will dash the hopes of this group," Erdogan said.
Erdogan slammed the recent phone taping attempts as a crime, vowing to prosecute all those involved, hinting at the "parallel entity" which the government accuses of carrying out these operations.
On Saturday, the Gulen-owned STV channel broadcast a news story which read: "The Israeli Air Defense forces bombed 7 terrorist sites in Gaza."
Link: /www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/europe/10326-turkish-pm-denounces-pro-gulen-channels-designation-of-palestinian-resistance-as-terrorists.
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Erdogan: I will not give in to any coup attempts
21 February 2014
Source: Middle East Monitor
Turkey will not give in to future coup attempts or pressure, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Thursday.
"We will face any future coup attempts just as we have faced them over the past 12 years and as we faced the recent coup attempt. We will not give in to any conspiracies or pressures," Erdogan said in a speech made before the Confederation of Turkish Labour Unions.
He went on to stress that the political factions are facing the recent attacks collectively "because we stopped the wheel of treason. However, these attacks will not affect us, we have grown used to them since the February 28 [1997] coup, the organisers of which did not commit as much immorality as we are witnessing today."
Link: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/europe/9895-erdogan-i-will-not-give-in-to-any-coup-attempts.
Source: Middle East Monitor
Turkey will not give in to future coup attempts or pressure, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Thursday.
"We will face any future coup attempts just as we have faced them over the past 12 years and as we faced the recent coup attempt. We will not give in to any conspiracies or pressures," Erdogan said in a speech made before the Confederation of Turkish Labour Unions.
He went on to stress that the political factions are facing the recent attacks collectively "because we stopped the wheel of treason. However, these attacks will not affect us, we have grown used to them since the February 28 [1997] coup, the organisers of which did not commit as much immorality as we are witnessing today."
Link: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/europe/9895-erdogan-i-will-not-give-in-to-any-coup-attempts.
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
Turkish PM reportedly sued for for libel by former ally
February 4, 2014
Source: Yahoo News
Gulen's
Hizmet movement does indeed wield considerable influence in the
judiciary and police but he has denied being behind the corruption
probe.
His organisation issued a statement last month saying the government "seems to be poisoned with power".
The Journalists and Writers Foundation, a group linked to Gulen, listed on Tuesday a string of recent "deeply worrying developments" that risk making Turkey "lose its character as a state governed by the rule of law".
These included limits on the freedom of expression, unlawful wiretaps, "purging" civil servants, pressure on the media, the use of "hate-centred language", accusations of "treason" and efforts to place the judiciary under government control, it said.
Source: Yahoo News
Istanbul (AFP) - Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ally-turned-rival Fethullah Gulen is
suing him in the wake of a deeply damaging corruption scandal, a
newspaper close to Gulen's movement reported Tuesday.
Gulen,
an Islamic preacher living in self-imposed exile in the United States,
is claiming 100,000 lira (32,700 euros, $44,200) in damages from Erdogan
for allegedly denigrating and insulting remarks, the Zaman daily said.
Erdogan,
59, Turkey's strongman premier since 2003, has blamed a "parallel"
state of Gulen's associates within the judiciary and police for a major
graft probe that opened in December implicating members of Erdogan's
inner circle and their families.
Erdogan
has sacked or reassigned hundreds of police and prosecutors, portraying
the allegations of shady dealings as part of a plot to weaken his
government ahead of local elections on March 30 and a presidential poll
in August.
The purges, coupled
with a heavy-handed police crackdown on protests last June, moves to
exert more control on the judiciary and mooted Internet legislation have
raised deep concern at home and abroad about mainly Muslim Turkey.
His organisation issued a statement last month saying the government "seems to be poisoned with power".
The Journalists and Writers Foundation, a group linked to Gulen, listed on Tuesday a string of recent "deeply worrying developments" that risk making Turkey "lose its character as a state governed by the rule of law".
These included limits on the freedom of expression, unlawful wiretaps, "purging" civil servants, pressure on the media, the use of "hate-centred language", accusations of "treason" and efforts to place the judiciary under government control, it said.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Turkey purges regulators, state TV in graft probe backlash
January 18, 2014
By Humeyra Pamuk
Source:Yahoo News
Unver said the aim of the purge at the
telecommunications watchdog could be to prevent further videos and
pictures being published on the Internet.
"They are seeking a monolithic structure over the Internet," he said.
By Humeyra Pamuk
Source:Yahoo News
ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkey has
extended a purge of official bodies to the banking and telecoms
regulators and state TV, firing dozens of executives in moves that
appear to broaden Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan's backlash against a
corruption investigation.
The
authorities have already reassigned thousands of police officers and
about 20 prosecutors, and fired some state television officials in
response to the corruption investigation, the biggest challenge to
Erdogan's 11-year rule.
Investigators are believed to have been looking into allegations of
corruption and bribery involving trade in gold with Iran and big real
estate projects, although full details of their charges have not been
made public.
The combative
prime minister says the investigations, which began a month ago with
arrests of high profile figures including the sons of three of his
cabinet ministers, are part of an attempted "judicial coup".
His opponents say they fear a purge of official bodies will destroy the independence of the judiciary, police and media.
"It's like reformatting a computer. They are changing the whole system
and people in various positions to protect the government," said Akin
Unver, assistant professor of International Relations in Istanbul-based
Kadir Has University.
Among
dozens of officials dismissed in the latest sackings, Turkish media
reported on Saturday that the deputy head of the banking watchdog BDDK
and two department heads had been removed.
Five department chiefs were fired at the Telecommunications Directorate
(TIB), a body that carries out electronic surveillance as well as
serving as telecoms regulator, and a dozen people were fired at Turkey's
state channel TRT, including department heads and senior news editors.
A government official said the firings were carried out for "the
benefit of the public" and more could come: "Right now we are working on
this issue and if we identify cases problematic to the public's
benefit, more dismissals could be considered."
Pictures of money-counting machines and reports of cash stacked in the
homes of people linked to the graft probe have caused uproar among the
Turkish public.
"They are seeking a monolithic structure over the Internet," he said.
Several thousand people took to the streets in Turkey's biggest three
cities on Saturday demonstrating against a government-led draft bill to
increase controls over the Internet.
The bill would give the courts the power to rule on removing online
material that "violates individual rights", an article that opponents
say is murky and could lead to the arbitrary closure of websites.
In Istanbul's Taksim Square, where police fired teargas and water
cannon to disperse the crowd, protesters called for the government to
resign. Some chanted: "There are thieves around," referring to the
corruption allegations.
SEIZURE OF ASSETS
Erdogan has suggested the graft inquiry, which has led to the
resignation of three cabinet ministers and detention of businessmen
close to the government, is an attempt to undermine his rule by
Fethullah Gulen, a U.S.-based cleric with influence among the police and
judiciary.
Earlier in the week the government reassigned twenty high-profile prosecutors, stepping up the purge of the judiciary.
Many of the people who have been fired are believed to be associated
with the cleric's Hizmet movement, which claims more than a million
followers and runs schools and charities throughout Turkey.
Gulen's lawyer says the cleric has nothing to do with the graft
investigations, and his followers say they are victims of a witch hunt.
In a separate move denounced by the opposition as an attempt to target
it, Turkish authorities have seized the assets of Mustafa Sarigul, the
main opposition CHP party's mayoral candidate for Istanbul.
The state Savings Deposit
Insurance Fund (TMSF) said it seized Sarigul's assets after he and his
business partners failed to repay a loan dating back to 1998.
Sarigul denied he had an outstanding debt, describing the move as "a provocation".
"I have not received one single letter from TMSF in 16 years... Those
who have lost the trust of the people and carried out this political
attack on me will get the answer at the ballot box on March 30," he
said, referring to local elections.
Erdogan, who has presided over an extended economic boom that has
transformed Turkey and lifted millions of people from poverty, remains
the country's most popular politician.
He and his moderate Islamist AK Party have long battled for influence
against the secularist military establishment that dominated Turkey over
the past century. Conflicts with the judiciary, police and Gulen
followers add to his list of enemies.
It is still not clear what effect the crisis will have on Erdogan's
political fortunes ahead of local elections approaching in March.
Last year saw mass street demonstrations among Turks who accuse the
prime minister of authoritarianism, but those protests did little to
undermine Erdogan's support among his conservative base of followers.
(Additional reporting by Orhan Coskun and Mert Ozkan in Ankara, Ayla
Jean Yackley in Istanbul, Reporting by Humeyra Pamuk; Editing by Peter
Graff and Andrew Heavens)
Erdogan's son ready to testify over graft probe
January 24, 2014
Source: Yahoo News
Gulen has denied any
involvement in the probe but hundreds of police officials, prosecutors
and judges — either directly involved in the investigations or believed
to sympathize with the religious movement — have been removed from posts
and reassigned to other positions.
"If you are honest and honorable, you'll come and show the evidence," Erdogan said in a speech in Ankara on Friday, responding to opposition party accusations that the government was trying to cover up a corruption inquiry focusing on his son.
Source: Yahoo News
ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Friday hit back at critics who
have alleged that he has been stalling a corruption investigation
reaching his family, while a lawyer says the leader's son was ready to
give testimony to prosecutors.
Erdogan last
month dismissed four government ministers implicated in a vast
corruption and bribery scandal surrounding alleged illicit money
transfers to Iran and bribery for construction projects. He then quickly
moved to replace police officials involved in the investigation, an
action which news reports said thwarted a second corruption probe that
sought to question his son, Bilal Erdogan, among others. Police
allegedly refused to bring Erdogan's son for questioning on prosecutors'
orders.
Erdogan insists the
corruption investigation targeting people close to him has been
orchestrated by an Islamic movement led by U.S.-based cleric Fethullah
Gulen. Erdogan says Gulen's followers have risen to key positions in
Turkey's judiciary and police, and that they want to harm the government
ahead of local elections in March.
"If you are honest and honorable, you'll come and show the evidence," Erdogan said in a speech in Ankara on Friday, responding to opposition party accusations that the government was trying to cover up a corruption inquiry focusing on his son.
He then threatened to
reveal a corruption file on the opposition party's strong candidate for
the mayor of Istanbul in the March local elections, unless the
opposition party releases the file by Sunday.
In a more conciliatory gesture,
Erdogan said that some articles of much-criticized draft legislation —
which critics say aims to tighten government control over the judiciary —
could be put on hold. Opposition parties say the measure would allow
the government to block corruption investigations, and the European
Union expressed concerns, calling on Turkey to respect the principles of
rule of law and the separation of powers.
The
state-run Anadolu Agency quoted lawyer Ahmet Ozel as saying late
Thursday that 33-year old Bilal Erdogan was prepared to give testimony
but he had not received any papers summoning him to testify.
"My client is ready to go and testify to prosecutors upon reception of an official notification," Anadolu quoted Ozel as saying.
The
statement came following a brawl in parliament where opposition
legislators accused the prime minister of obstructing the investigation
and of "harboring" a man wanted for questioning. An opposition deputy
was briefly hospitalized after being punched by a legislator from
Erdogan's party.
Erdogan on
Friday refused to apologize to the opposition legislator who was hurt in
the scuffles in Parliament, saying opposition deputies had provoked the
fight by insulting him and his family.
"Whoever insulted me and my family to such an extent should apologize first," Erdogan said.
Turkish
newspapers last month published details of an allegedly leaked
prosecutors' summons calling Bilal Erdogan to give testimony as a
"suspect" in an investigation into an alleged organized crime syndicate.
Newspaper reports said the investigation allegedly surrounds
irregularities in the operations of an educational foundation whose
board members include Bilal Erdogan.
The prosecutor who issued the
summons complained that police officers had not carried out his orders
for arrests and accused the Istanbul chief prosecutor and police of
hampering the probe. He was later removed from the case.
The
corruption scandal and Erdogan's response has eroded investor
confidence, causing the Turkish lira to plummet to almost daily record
lows. Turkey's central bank announced Thursday that it was intervening
in the foreign exchange markets but failed to stop the lira's slide.
Erdogan threatens to unveil graft accusations against rival
January 24, 2014
Source: Yahoo News
Source: Yahoo News
ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkish Prime
Minister Tayyip Erdogan threatened on Friday to t divulge a file of
corruption allegations against the main opposition candidate for
Istanbul mayor, raising the stakes in a political battle after a graft
investigation implicating his own government.
The opposition accused Erdogan of bullying and defied him to make public any accusations he cared to level.
Erdogan, speaking to party members in the capital Ankara, also accused a
key business leader of "treason" for saying the government's efforts to
reform the judiciary might unnerve investors and deter foreign capital
from coming to Turkey.
Erdogan called on Kemal Kilicdaroglu, chairman of the main opposition
Republican People's Party (CHP), to disclose what he called corruption
allegations in a party file against Mustafa Sarigul, the CHP's candidate
for Istanbul mayor in March municipal elections.
"I'm giving you until Sunday. If
you don't disclose the corruption file on the Istanbul municipal
candidate, I will," Erdogan said in comments aired live on television.
He did not make clear what such a file would contain.
CHP Deputy Chairman Haluk Koc, responding to Erdogan, said:
"No one is holding you back. The security forces, judiciary and police
are yours. The CHP is here, Sarigul is here, disclose whatever you know.
"Bring it on. Does extortion suit a prime minister? CHP has never bowed down to bullies. It won't take a step back."
Erdogan also accused Kilicdaroglu himself of involvement in the leak of
a 2010 sex tape that forced the resignation of his predecessor at the
CHP, Deniz Baykal. Erdogan did not elaborate.
Turkey's popular leader sees a police investigation into corruption and
bribery charges that came to light last month and included the arrest
of family members of cabinet ministers and businessmen close to the
government as a "coup plot" against the ruling AK Party, in power since
2002.
He has responded by
removing thousands of police officers and about 120 prosecutors from
their posts and reassigned them and by pushing through legal changes
that tighten his control over the judiciary.
On Thursday, Muharrem Yilmaz, chairman of the business group Tusiad,
said such legal changes may not comply with European Union norms and
could raise concerns about the rule of law.
Erdogan lashed out at Yilmaz, saying such a warning amounted to a threat against the government.
"You can't say, 'International capital won't come.' If you do, it's treason against this country.
"They are threatening their own government by saying foreign investment
won't come ... We will take a stance against those who take a stance
against the AK Party," Erdogan said.
The political turmoil has weighed on Turkish financial markets, with the lira plumbing record lows.
But capital outflows have been relatively limited, with Thursday's
successful sale of a $2.5 billion eurobond issue seen as a vote of
confidence from foreign investors.
(Reporting by Ayla Jean Yackley; editing by Ralph Boulton)
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Erdogan tells Turkish ambassadors to spread word of 'treacherous' plot
21 hours ago
By Tulay Karadeniz
Source: Yahoo News
Erdogan has overseen strong economic growth in
Turkey since coming to power in 2002, transforming its reputation after a
series of unstable coalition governments in the 1990s ran into repeated
balance of payments problems and economic crises.
The AK Party's reputation for economic management has been one of the cornerstones of its three successive election wins over the past decade, a record Erdogan wants to maintain in the run up to local elections in March and a presidential race which he is expected to contest in August.
By Tulay Karadeniz
Source: Yahoo News
ANKARA (Reuters) - Prime
Minister Tayyip Erdogan ordered his ambassadors on Wednesday to confront
allies with the "truth" that a graft investigation shaking Ankara was
the result of a foreign-backed plot to sabotage Turkey's international
standing.
Erdogan, visiting
Brussels next week, also mockingly rejected European Union expressions
of concern about his moves to tighten control over a judiciary he sees
as central to the conspiracy. His finance minister said political
turbulence may hinder Turkey in reaching a 4 percent growth target this
year.
What erupted a month
ago as a corruption inquiry involving the sons of three ministers and
businessmen close to the government has grown into one of the biggest
challenges of Erdogan's 11-year rule and damaged Turkey's image abroad.
Erdogan said politicians, domestic and foreign media and financiers were conspiring against Turkish interests.
"We expect you to exert more effort to defeat this treacherous
operation targeting Turkey by telling our partners the truth," Erdogan
told the conference of Turkish ambassadors in the capital Ankara.
Details of the corruption allegations have not been made public, but
are thought to relate to construction and real estate projects and
Turkey's gold trade with Iran.
Erdogan's supporters see U.S.-based Turkish cleric Fethullah Gulen - a
former ally whose network of followers is influential in the police and
judiciary - as a prime mover in a plot backed by foreign collaborators.
"They are trying to deal a heavy blow to Turkey's economy. They are
making efforts to push interest rates higher. In order to make
international investors uneasy they use every means.
"Most importantly they are working hard to harm Turkey's image in the world," Erdogan said.
He has responded by purging the police of hundreds of officers and
seeking tighter control over the appointment of judges and prosecutors,
raising alarm in Brussels in particular, which has been engaged in years
of protracted EU membership negotiations with Ankara.
EU enlargement commissioner Stefan Fule told Turkey's new EU minister
Mevlut Cavusoglu in their first meeting this week that any changes to
the judiciary must not call into question Turkey's commitment to meeting
EU membership criteria.
Erdogan rejected such concerns.
"I'm sorry but we won't be taken in by evaluation like 'this is
contrary to the European Union acquis'. We know how to read and write.
We can see what is going on," he said.
ECONOMIC FALLOUT
Erdogan's AK Party has proposed a draft bill giving government more say
over the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK), which makes top
judicial appointments, a move the opposition says would violate the
constitution and sees as an attempt to stifle the corruption
investigation.
President
Abdullah Gul, who would have to ratify the bill, called for compromise
on Wednesday, saying Turkey's rival political parties should instead
agree on changes to articles in the constitution governing the
judiciary.
"There is
agreement among the parties that there should be an HSYK which is
independent and impartial and within the framework of EU principles,"
Gul said, adding prospects for a deal should become clear within a
couple of days.
But the main
opposition CHP said it would only negotiate if Erdogan withdrew the
draft bill first, while a senior AK Party official said he was not
optimistic of reaching a compromise.
The feud has shaken investor confidence and raised questions about the
credibility of Turkey's institutions, helping drive the lira - already
battered by waning investor appetite for emerging markets - to historic
lows.
Finance Minister Mehmet
Simsek said the political turbulence was among factors which could
prevent Turkey reaching its target of four percent economic growth this
year.
"It makes investors
tense both domestically and abroad. This tension will be reflected in
consumption and investment decisions and hence in growth," he told a
news conference.
The AK Party's reputation for economic management has been one of the cornerstones of its three successive election wins over the past decade, a record Erdogan wants to maintain in the run up to local elections in March and a presidential race which he is expected to contest in August.
(Additional reporting by Adrian Croft in Brussels; Writing by Daren Butler and Nick Tattersall; Editing by Ralph Boulton)
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Turkish graft scandal triggers feud over judicial independence
January 10, 2014
By Orhan Coskun
Source: Yahoo News
The AKP bill, published on parliament's website,
proposes changes to the structure of the HSYK, the body responsible for
appointments in the judiciary, which would give the justice minister
greater power over its activities.
Erdogan's supporters have cast the corruption probe as a smear campaign contrived, ahead of elections this year, by a U.S.-based Islamic cleric, Fethullah Gulen, who exercises broad, if covert, influence in the judiciary and media.
By Orhan Coskun
Source: Yahoo News
ANKARA (Reuters) - One of
Turkey's most senior legal figures warned Prime Minister Tayyip
Erdogan's AK Party on Friday that efforts to tighten its grip on the
judiciary would breach the constitution, deepening a crisis triggered by
a damaging corruption scandal.
Erdogan has cast a wide-ranging graft investigation, which poses one of
the biggest challenges of his 11-year rule, as an attempted "judicial
coup" and has responded by purging the police force of hundreds of
officers and seeking tighter control over judicial appointments.
His AK Party unveiled plans this week, due to be discussed by
parliament's justice commission, to give government more say over the
appointment of judges and prosecutors, rolling back reforms championed
by the European Union.
"These
regulations concerning the independence and impartiality of judges ...
will be in contravention of the constitution," said Ahmet Hamsici,
deputy chairman of the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK), in
a 66-page report.
"It is
clear that this situation represents a contravention of the principle of
judicial independence (and) the separation of powers," said the report,
submitted on Friday to the parliamentary commission and seen by
Reuters.
Erdogan's supporters have cast the corruption probe as a smear campaign contrived, ahead of elections this year, by a U.S.-based Islamic cleric, Fethullah Gulen, who exercises broad, if covert, influence in the judiciary and media.
The affair, exposing a deep rift within the Turkish political
establishment, has driven the lira to new lows and shaken investor
confidence in a country whose stability has largely derived from
Erdogan's strong grip on power.
But it is the government's reaction, seeking tighter control over the
judiciary, police and even the internet, which risks doing the deepest
long-term damage, not least to Turkey's ambitions to join the European
Union and to its relations with Washington, already critical of its
record on human rights.
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Turkey's Halkbank denies wrongdoing in Iran deals
December 23, 2013
Source: Yahoo News
Source: Yahoo News
Istanbul (AFP) - Turkey's
state-owned Halkbank, whose chief executive was arrested in connection
with a sweeping graft investigation, said on Monday it complied with the
law when doing business with sanctions-hit Iran.
"Our bank's business transactions are regularly audited by relevant authorities," the bank said in a statement
.
"The
financial intermediation that our bank offers with regard to trade
activities with Iran have been conducted in accordance with
regulations," it added.
The
statement comes after Halkbank chief executive Suleyman Aslan was
charged Saturday with taking bribes, while Azerbaijani businessman Reza
Zarrab was charged with forming a ring that bribed officials to help
disguise illegal gold sales to Iran via Halkbank.
Police had also reportedly found $4.5 million in cash stored in shoe boxes in Aslan's home.
Twenty-four
people have been charged so far in connection with the high-profile
investigation including the sons of Interior Minister Muarrem Guler and
Economy Minister Zafer Caglayan as well as several top business leaders.
On Saturday, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan defended Halkbank which he claimed was targeted by international plotters.
"We
have raised the bank's market value to $25 billion. They are targeting
this successful state bank," he said. "This bank is intimidating
Turkey's enemies."
Halkbank has come under fire from some quarters in the United States for alleged illegal transactions to Iran.
The
bank said it stopped transactions to Iran as of June 10 after the
United States announced further sanctions against the Islamic republic.
Several
pro-government media outlets claimed over the weekend that US
ambassador to Turkey Francis Ricciardone told some European Union
ambassadors that Washington asked the bank to cut its ties with Iran --
the allegations vehemently denied by the ambassador.
The
reports however infuriated the prime minister who warned he may expel
some foreign ambassadors over "provocative actions", in remarks
considered a veiled threat to Ricciardone.
Deputy
Prime Minister Ali Babacan said Sunday that Halkbank has lost $1.6
billion in market value since the scandal broke out and branded the
investigation as an operation aimed at undermining Turkey's economic
stability.
Saturday, July 20, 2013
Turkey's Erdogan slams world's 'double standards' on Egypt
Jul 19, 2013
By Jonathon Burch
Source:Reuters
By Jonathon Burch
Source:Reuters
(Reuters) - Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan accused Western and Arab nations of "double standards" for failing to condemn the overthrow of former Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi, whose Muslim Brotherhood like Erdogan has Islamist roots.
Turkey has emerged as one of the fiercest international critics of what it has called an "unacceptable coup" after Egypt's powerful military shunted the country's elected leader from office earlier this month.
Although the United States has expressed concern at Mursi's removal and called for a swift return to democracy, as has the European Union, it has stopped short of calling it a coup, which might have led to sanctions.
Gulf Arab states, which see Egypt as a strategic ally against any threat from non-Arab Iran, celebrated his departure with palpable relief.
"Countries which embrace and care about democracy should not behave with double standards towards these kinds of events and should say something is wrong when it is wrong," Erdogan told Western, Arab and other ambassadors late on Thursday.
"Those who extol democracy when they meet with us, saying 'one must not compromise on democracy', we want to see their backbone," Erdogan told his guests at a dinner to break the Muslim Ramadan fast.
Erdogan asked why the world stayed silent over the at least 99 people who have died since Mursi was ousted, more than half of them when troops fired on Islamist protesters on July 8.
"Why aren't you speaking up? Come on, speak up against this. There's no point in being ambivalent," he told the diplomats seated around the room at party headquarters in Ankara.
"If you are not going to speak up here, where are you going you to speak?"
REGIONAL INFLUENCE
Erdogan was feted by adoring crowds in Arab capitals only two years ago when Turkey seemed set to expand its trade and influence across the region on the back of his support for the protesters of the Arab Spring.
Egyptians hailed the Turkish leader as a hero on Tahrir Square in 2011, when he was among the first world leaders to tell Hosni Mubarak his time was up.
But Erdogan's popularity at home and in the region took a dent after a crackdown on nationwide anti-government protests last month in which five people died and thousands were injured.
Egypt's new interim government has warned Ankara not to meddle in its internal affairs and last week summoned Turkey's ambassador to Cairo. Egypt's ambassador in Ankara was not present at Thursday's dinner.
Turkey's response to Egypt is at least partly shaped by its own history of having experienced three military coups since 1960, and the removal of its first Islamist government in 1997, events which Erdogan referred to in his speech.
It is a history not lost on Mursi's supporters.
"Because it has a history of coups, Turkey understands us better and does not want us to go through the same suffering that it has gone through," Abdul Mawgoud Dardery, a former MP from Mursi's Freedom & Justice Party, told Reuters this week.
"Erdogan is still a hero in Egypt and in the rest of the Arab world ... If Erdogan ran for election in Egypt he would most likely win the presidency."
(Additional reporting by Ayla Yackley; Editing by Nick Tattersall and Sonya Hepinstall)
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Turkey's Erdogan seeks to further curb army power
2 hours ago
by: Parisa Hafezi
Reuters
Source: Yahoo News
by: Parisa Hafezi
Reuters
Source: Yahoo News
ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan's government, which faced a wave of street protests and riots this month, moved on Thursday to amend an article of the Armed Forces charter cited by generals in the past to justify coups as defense of public order.
Since he was first elected in 2002, Erdogan has radically cut back the power of a military that had toppled four governments in forty years. The last administration felled, in 1997, was led by an Islamist party to which Erdogan belonged.
Deputy prime minister Bekir Bozdag told reporters the government had submitted proposals to parliament to amend article 35 of the charter, promulgated after a 1960 coup that resulted in the hanging of a prime minister. Erdogan has cited that prime minister, Adnan Menderes, as a political model.
The article was later used as the basis for interventions in 1970 and in 1980, to end months of left-right streetfighting, as well as 1997 when the army saw a danger from political Islam.
The amendment would replace the declared duty to "protect and watch over the republic" - a reference that for many Turks would imply strictly enforcing a secular order - with a more limited obligation to defend "the Turkish homeland against foreign threats".
COUP ALLEGATIONS
Erdogan, who has won three elections and despite recent protests has no clear political rivals, denies accusations he seeks to overturn the 90-year-old secular order. But in speeches in recent weeks he has railed against what he sees as the oppression of pious Muslims under previous governments.
Opponents accuse him of becoming increasingly authoritarian.
Hundreds of top officers have been arrested in recent years as part of an investigation into alleged plots against Erdogan. One, codenamed 'Ergenekon' foresaw the engineering of street protests and killings opening the way for an army takeover.
Erdogan blamed this month's protests and rioting - the largest show of public defiance of his time in office - on a foreign-backed conspiracy involving market speculators, "terrorist" groups and looters.
The demonstrations drew in leftists, secularists, nationalists, professionals, unions and students after police used water cannon and tear gas in a heavy handed attempt to disperse an initial demonstration against the development of an Istanbul park.
Parliament will discuss the bill in October after its summer recess.
(Writing by Parisa Hafezi; Editing by Nick Tattersall and Ralph Boulton)
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Turkey protests test Obama's ties with Erdogan
3 hrs ago
By JULIE PACE | Associated Press
Source: Yahoo News
By JULIE PACE | Associated Press
Source: Yahoo News
WASHINGTON (AP) — Government crackdowns against protesters in Turkey could test the close ties between PresidentBarack Obama and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a strategically important U.S. ally in a tumultuous region.
The demonstrations in Turkey, now entering their second week, cropped up after Erdogan's visit to the White House last month, which highlighted a variety of issues on which the U.S. needs Turkey's help. They include quelling the violence in Syria, stabilizing Iraq and stemming Iran's nuclear ambitions.
Erdogan, known for his brash and stubborn leadership style, has responded to the public outcry by questioning the legitimacy of the protesters. In a series of increasingly belligerent speeches to supporters Sunday, the prime minister warned that his patience was wearing thin and said those who do not respect the government will pay.
Hundreds of police in riot gear briefly fired tear gas canisters and rubber bullets at protestors in Istanbul's central Taksim Square early Tuesday, forcing many protestors who had occupied the square into a nearby park. Some groups also clashed with police at one edge of the square, setting off fireworks, firebombs and throwing stones at a police water cannon.
The clash mirrored previous confrontations between Turkish police and protestors, which have also involved the use of tear gas and water cannons. Turkish authorities are trying halt demonstrations, which have spread to nearly 80 cities across the country.
James Jeffrey, who served as Obama's ambassador to Turkey until 2010, said that in private discussions among U.S. officials "there's some wincing at the statements by Erdogan."
But in public, the White House has carefully avoided criticizing the prime minister directly, though the U.S. has urged Turkish authorities to exercise restraint. There also have been no known conversations between Obama and his Turkish counterpart since the protests began.
"We continue to have serious concerns about the reports of excessive use of force by police and large numbers of injuries and damage to property, and welcome calls for these events to be investigated," White House press secretary Jay Carney said Monday. "We also continue to urge all parties to refrain from provoking violence." He did not mention Erdogan.
"This is always the quandary for the U.S. government," said Bulent Aliriza, a Turkey analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "When you get that close to an ally, you become very careful about criticizing them."
That's the pattern the U.S. fell into with former Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak, an autocrat who found favor with the U.S. by protecting American interests in the Middle East. The U.S. only turned on Mubarak after the Egyptian people launched mass protests against his government in 2011 as part of the Arab Spring push for democracy that swept through the region.
Despite the unrest in Turkey, Erdogan doesn't appear in danger of losing power. But the protests have exposed pent-up hostility among many Turks who fear Erdogan is backsliding on his early record of democratic reform and seeking to impose his religious views on the secular nation.
The anti-government rallies started after police launched a pre-dawn raid against a peaceful sit-in protesting plans to uproot trees in Istanbul's Taksim Square. Since then, tens of thousands of mostly secular Turks have joined the demonstrations, turning them into Turkey's biggest anti-government disturbances in years.
For the White House, Erdogan's handling of the challenge to his leadership could complicate Turkey's close but complex relationship with the U.S.
Since taking office, Obama has taken significant steps to point to Turkey as a model for other majority-Islamic nations pursuing democracy and ties with the West. Three months after winning the White House, Obama put Turkey on the itinerary for his first foreign tour as president, a 2009 trip that was aimed in part at resetting the U.S. relationship with the Muslim world. While touring Turkey alongside Erdogan, Obama cast the ties between their two countries as a "model partnership."
Since then, the two leaders have spoken frequently by phone, conferred on the sidelines of international summits and held two White House meetings, most recently in May.
Despite the robust relationship between the U.S. and Turkey, Erdogan has created headaches for Obama before. In 2010, Turkey broke with the U.S. and voted against United Nations sanctions against Iran over its disputed nuclear program. Erdogan also ratcheted up tensions with Israel earlier this year when he called Zionism "a crime against humanity."
The lengthy civil war in Syria has exposed perhaps the deepest rift between Erdogan and Obama. While both want Syrian President Bashar Assad out of power, the prime minister has become frustrated with Obama's reluctance to use military force to end the violence.
Erdogan pushed Obama during their recent talks to deepen U.S. involvement in Syria, but the Turkish leader received none of the assurances he sought.
Obama, however, has proven to have some measure of influence over his Turkish counterpart.
Earlier this year, Obama brokered a truce between Israel and Turkey, which had cut diplomatic ties following an Israeli attack on a Turkish aid flotilla bound for Gaza. Analysts say Erdogan would have been far less willing to accept an apology from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had Obama not also been on the line during the phone call.
Aliriza, the Turkey expert at CSIS, said Obama's success in restarting diplomatic relations between Turkey and Israel underscores the influence Obama could have now in shaping the prime minister's response to the protests.
"There is only one man in this world that Erdogan listens to, and that's Barack Obama," he said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)