Showing posts with label Al-Sisi regime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al-Sisi regime. Show all posts

Monday, March 7, 2016

Egypt NGO Condemns Death Sentences Issued by Coup Military Court to Civilians

March 3,2016
Source: Ikhwanweb



In a statement Wednesday, Egyptian rights organization ECRF rejects the latest batch of death sentences from a military court as extrajudicial killings by the coup regime seeking to eliminate all opposition.

Egyptian Coordinating Committee of Rights and Freedom (ECRF) condemns the life prison terms and death sentences issued Wednesday by Alexandria military criminal court in the Kafr El-Sheikh Stadium case. The court ordered the execution of seven citizens (all civilians) and handed down life sentences to five more, 15-year sentences to two people and 3-year terms to two others.

For its part, ECRF condemns the surge in referrals of civilians to military courts where a fair trial as enshrined in international covenants and treaties as well as Egyptian constitutions and laws is not a possibility. ECRF also denounces the authorities' usurping of citizens' right to appear before their natural judge.

ECRF deems all the military sentences issued Wednesday null and void, since they fail international standards on fair trial.

Those death sentences are nothing more than state-sponsored extrajudicial killings – an integral part of a systematic campaign to execute all the regime's political opponents under the pretext of law.

ECRF urges the implementation of the principles of the Egyptian Constitution and the law, as well as established rules of international law on the right of the accused to appear before an ordinary court in a fair trial, with citizens not referred to trial before military courts ever.

ECRF calls on all local and international human rights organizations to unite and address those daily violations and crimes against the rights of Egyptian citizens, who suffer extreme humiliation and inhuman brutality.

Egyptian Coordinating Committee of Rights and Freedom (ECRF) #التنسيقية_المصرية_للحقوق_والحريات

Cairo: Wednesday - March 2, 2016

Political Prisoners' Families: Aqrab Prison Hunger-Strikers Protest Persistent, Escalating Violations

February 29,2016
Source: Ikhwanweb



Aqrab Detainees Families Association issues a statement detailing current hunger-strike steps and demands.

The Aqrab Detainees Families Association (ADFA) affirms that a number of detainees in Aqrab Prison started an open-ended hunger-strike to protest the jail's flaunting of relevant laws, and to demand it conforms to the Constitution like all prisons in Egypt.

The political prisoners' hunger-strike is entitled "I am a human" and demands detainees' basic rights as follows:

1. A weekly visit for detainees' families, without glass barriers, which should be one hour long, as prescribed in the Prisons Act.

2. Improving the prison's food and water so they would be fit for human consumption, in terms of quality and quantity.

3. Allowing all essential personal items brought by families in visits – the least of which is food of appropriate quantity, and toiletries, medicines, personal hygiene items, clothes, blankets and books, which should not be confiscated by prison administration after the visit.

4. Granting detainees their right to exercise out of their cells for the daily period of time set in the Prisons Act.

The strike came after two weeks of extreme humiliation, violations and assaults on detainees' families trying to visit their loved ones, especially since February 10, as follows:

January 24 to February 10: All visits to Aqrab Prison were banned, and in some wings, tiny windows in cell doors (the only 'openings' they have) were blocked with heavy metal covers.

February 10: Visits were allowed again, but for a maximum of only 20 detainees a day. This forced families to spend the night outside the prison to stand any chance of seeing their loved ones the following day. This absurd limit was raised to an arbitrary 30 detainees a day, in a prison that holds over a thousand inmates.

February 14: Prison officers assaulted 4 visiting women, brutally beating, then arresting and holding them in custody. Those were: Salma Abdel-Rauf and her mother, Yomna and Rahma Khairy (two sisters). The officers' violence happened after they pushed families out, announcing they were stopping visits for the day. Then, visiting families who had not seen their loved ones as yet protested.

February 15 and 16: Forty-three detainees' families lodged collective complaints with the National Council for Human Rights protesting the ban on visits and the assaults and abuse they had to endure (eg complaint No. 949 dated February 15 and No. 1003 dated February 16, 2016).

February 17: Mohamed Rabie Zawahiri, Ismail Abdel-Qader Ibrahim and Nabil Abdel-Moneim El-Shahat, together with a number of young detainees, began a total hunger-strike, demanding decent treatment and their visit rights.

February 18: A number of detainees' families organized a demonstration at the entrance to the Journalists' Syndicate in protest against the conditions of their incarcerated loved ones in Aqrab Prison and the humiliation they suffer during visits.

February 23: Some of the families who were allowed a visit saw two young detainees being carried out from an exercise area. A prison official told them that because of the strike, they can no longer stand, let alone walk, and added that at least two others had to be hospitalized because of their hunger-strike.

February 24: A woman visiting her husband was hit in the face by a prison officer. Another officer hit a little girl on her back. Thus, at least six members of visiting families were assaulted in less than two weeks. Also, a prison visitors' bus overturned as they entered Aqrab Prison, because prison staff forced too many people on it. This accident caused injuries to many passengers, including fractures and bruises, while the wife of Magdi Mohamed Ibrahim suffered a broken right hand, and the wife of Mohamed Abdel-Wahab Mustafa had to be admitted to hospital in a critical condition.

February 24: Essam Sultan, Gihad Haddad and Mahmoud Barbary began an open-ended hunger-strike. On the same day, prison authorities prevented 60 families from visiting their loved ones.

February 25: Dr Ahmed Abdel-Aati, Dr Osama Yassin, Amin Sayrafi, Dr Essam Haddad, and other detainees joined the hunger strike.

February 27: Seven journalists detained in Aqrab Prison joined the strike. They were: Hisham Gaafar, Ahmed Subaie, Hassan Kabany, Walid Shalaby, Ahmed Saleh, Khaled Sahloub and Mohamed Nawareg.

Families of the detainees filed a report to the Public Prosecutor to protest the deteriorating conditions in Aqrab Prison, and held a press conference at the Journalists' Syndicate.

On the same day, hunger-strikers were threatened by the prison administration with removal to remote prisons, if the strike was not called off.

ADFA will publish updated data and information on any new developments in the hunger-strike and the strikers' situation in Aqrab Prison

Rights Organization Urges International Bodies to Help Stop Brutal Violations in Egyptian Prisons

March 3,2016
Source: Ikhwanweb



The Arab Organization for Human Rights in Britain details coup authorities' documented violations at Aqrab Prison, and urges relevant rights bodies to visit Egyptian jails to help stop atrocities committed regularly.

A number of detainees in Aqrab high security prison (in Tora compound) are on an indefinite hunger-strike in protest at inhuman squalid conditions and the authorities' frequent campaigns of extremely humiliating treatment, systematic torture and slow death, in addition to the most degrading treatment suffered by their relatives at the hands of prison administration during visits.

On February 21, 2016 more than 150 political prisoners declared a full hunger-strike. They were soon joined by others, bringing to 253 the number of hunger-strikers.

In testimonies submitted to the Arab Organization for Human Rights in Britain (AOHR), families of Aqrab Prison detainees confirmed that political prisoners are deprived of all legal rights stipulated by Egyptian law, the Prisons Act and prison regulations.

The statements also mentioned that detainees are locked inside filthy cramped cells with no vents of any kind, no beds or blankets either, and no toilets. Inmates are also denied the right to exercise, and ill ones are not allowed to take any medicines. Moreover, prison authorities deliberately refuse to treat ill prisoners in any hospitals, and do not provide adequate food fit for human consumption, according to families of detainees. Even worse, the prison administration only offers contaminated water to political prisoners to drink.

Families of detainees said they too suffered ill-treatment at the hands of prison officers and staff. The prison administration deliberately restricted visits and made them much more complicated than they legally should. The administration is not committed to even the lowest legal standards set by Egyptian law in the regulation of visits, neither in the type and quality of the place specified for visits, nor the duration of the visits allowed for each prisoner.

Adding insult to injury, Aqrab prison administration announced only 20 prisoners can receive visits in any one day (the prison has thousands of inmates). Desperate families are forced to go to Aqrab before the date of the visit, or at least ten hours before visiting times, to take a place in the queue. Families also complained of humiliating heavy-handed personal inspections, especially girls and women.

AOHR documented frequent attacks by Aqrab Prison security personnel on the families of detainees. They brutally beat them and kick them out, arbitrarily banning their visits.

In her testimony to AOHR on February 14, Yomna, the 24-year old daughter of detainee Khairy Abdel-Aziz Mohamed, 53, held at Aqrab Prison in H4 Wing 1, said: "We were on a visit to my father after an unjustified ban on visits for more than three weeks, and were surprised by the prison management refusing to allow families in, claiming that the capacity of the prison cannot afford more than 20 families visiting on any one day.

"We were among those barred. I protested the sudden and absurd ban, and so did my younger sister Rahma (13 years old), and demanded our right to visit our dad. Then, one of the prison officers attacked us, punching me in my face, and hitting my sister in the stomach with a baton, then he threw us out altogether."

AOHR has also received a complaint from the family of one of the hunger-striking detainees, called Mohamed Farid Khalifa, 22, held in Aqrab's block H-1 Wing 4, stating: "Mohamed started his hunger-strike a week ago. He suffered medical neglect in prison. He needs to attend treatment sessions for his left foot, injured in detention. He cannot walk on it at all since he was tortured, just after his arrest on August 12, 2014.

We always suffer extremely humiliating treatment during our visits to him. We come all the way from Alexandria, a long way off, to visit. However, the prison administration does not always allow us to enter. They now only allow 20 families to visit their loved ones. Even if we are allowed to enter, the visit is no more than ten minutes, and we have to suffer a most humiliating personal inspection".

In her testimony to AOHR, Ayah Alaa Hosni, the wife of a 33-year old journalist called Hassan Mahmoud Ragab Kabany, detained in Aqrab Prison' block H2 Wing 4, said: "My husband, along with other political prisoners, started a hunger-strike since February 21, to protest the poor conditions inside the prison.

"My husband has been held in a solitary cell in inhumane conditions since his arrest on January 22, 2015. He is not allowed even to exercise, nor to keep any personal belongings inside the cell. Moreover, both he and we suffer absurd restrictions during visits, like: we are separated with glass barriers and have to talk through a microphone, and visits are limited to 15 minutes."

Six political prisoners died due to deliberate medical neglect in Aqrab Prison since the beginning of the military coup in July 2013. Dozens more of ill detainees are at risk of death within the prison.

AOHR affirms that the abuses suffered by detainees and their families in Aqrab Orison are crimes of systematic torture and a form of collective punishment practiced by the Egyptian regime through state security agencies.

AOHR calls on the UN Secretary-General to take a moral stance about the serious violations committed by the Egyptian authorities against a large segment of Egyptian citizens. The world community's long silence has already emboldened the Egyptian authorities, who persist in their crimes.

AOHR urges specialized committees for prevention of torture, degrading treatment and arbitrary detention to visit Aqrab Prison and the rest of Egyptian prisons and put pressure on the Egyptian authorities to end political detention.

Arab Organization for Human Rights in Britain

Tuesday – March 1, 2016

Rights Organization Condemns Interior Ministry Death Threats to Aqrab Prison Detainees

Tuesday, March 1,2016 
Source: Ikhwanweb

An Egyptian NGO urges judicial authorities to take prompt action to prevent state-sponsored killing of political prisoners threatened by Interior Ministry officials
Egyptian Coordinating Committee of Rights and Freedom (ECRF) denounces Interior Ministry policies and Aqrab Prison management, which is deliberately escalating violations against detainees, instead of enforcing the law and implementing the Prisons Act.

In its rights campaign entitled #اغلقوا_العقرب (Close Aqrab Prison), ECRF received a number of complaints from the families of Aqrab Prison detainees in which they affirmed that top Interior Ministry officials personally threatened hunger-striking detainees, boasting that there is no limit to the violations they can commit until the strike is called off, adding that the ministry's highest bosses had given them the green light for more atrocities and more brutal repression until the striking detainees end their hunger-strike.

The detainees said they have been threatened with transfers to remote prisons with the promise of more brutal violations and abuse, such as Al-Wadi Al-Gadid Prison, and also with harassment of and assault on visiting families, complete bans of visits, and direct death threats.

ECRF affirms that all the above only mean that the Interior Ministry is deliberately escalating the crisis, instead of enforcing the law and the Constitution. Now, urgent intervention by judicial authorities is required to save the lives of Aqrab prisoners, and to stop the fierce campaign of repression and violations against them. Prompt and decisive action is urgently required before the Interior Ministry commits new crimes against political prisoners.

Egyptian Coordinating Committee of Rights and Freedom (ECRF) #التنسيقية_المصرية_للحقوق_والحريات

Cairo: Sunday – February 28, 2016

Friday, June 20, 2014

Corrupt Egypt gas deals revealed

09 June 2014
Source: Middle East Monitor



In Egypt's Lost Power, Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit reveals the hidden story of Egypt's oil and gas industry. It describes how tycoons cashed in as a nation lost out - and provides compelling new evidence that the Arab world's most populated country may soon become energy dependent on Israel.

The documentary describes how Egypt - once a major natural gas exporter - made a series of deals from so corrupt that it has devastated the nation's energy sector. What's more, the country that it sold gas to from 2008 to 2012 at below market prices - Israel - is now in possession of massive gas reserves that it intends to sell to Egypt.

Sources in Tel Aviv describe how, after the overthrow of President Mohammed Morsi, Egypt made clandestine approaches to the Israeli government in order to "ensure the flow of gas" to Egypt.
Former Israeli Energy Minister Yosef Paritzky told the program: "Egypt needs gas. We can sell it. What else can be better?"

More than a dozen industry specialists, including former and current officials, were interviewed over the course of this five-month investigation.

Investigative reporter Clayton Swisher tracked down and located fugitive billionaire Hussein Salem in Madrid as well as his former business partner (and former Mossad officer) Yossi Maiman outside his offices north of the Israeli capital, Tel Aviv.

The program examines Egyptian government records, court filings, and corporate records and discovered that powerful energy companies are now suing Egypt in numerous international arbitration courts.

The investigation also addresses how deliberately generated gas shortages played a role in the toppling of Egypt's first democratically elected President, Mohammed Morsi.

Edward Walker, a former U.S. Ambassador to Egypt and Israel, tells the show that many in Washington welcomed last year's coup. "He's attractive because he's not Morsi. And the concern has always been to maintain and sustain the relationship between Egypt and Israel. So it was not really in our interest to see them (the Muslim Brotherhood) succeed."

 Admiral William Fallon, a former head of U.S. Central Command rejected the policy of promoting democracy in the Middle East. "It isn't just about having elections. That's wonderful," he told Egypt's Lost Power. "But what comes after the election? If there's not a framework for making government work to accomplish things, then it's very hollow".

Former Israeli Ambassador Oded Eran, an advisor to the Knesset, welcomed a new energy relationship with Cairo. "If we can get into an agreement...supplying gas to Egypt, this will also cement the relations, political and economic, between Israel and Egypt."

Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit's previous scoops include the Palestine Papers, The Bin Laden Files, What Killed Arafat?, and Killing Arafat.

Egypt's Lost Power broadcasts on Al Jazeera English on Monday, June 9th at 2000 GMT, and 1900 GMT on Al Jazeera Arabic.

Link: www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/11971-corrupt-egypt-gas-deals-revealed.

The EU's willingness to work with Egypt undermines its condemnation of human rights abuses

06 June 2014
 Samira Shackle
Source: Middle East Monitor

When Mohamed Morsi, Egypt's democratically elected president, was ousted in July 2013, the European Union – along with other western powers – was unsure how best to respond. During the months that have passed, it has retained a cautious tone: condemning human rights abuses, while also tentatively praising aspects of the new government's policy programme.

Following the announcement that General Abdul Fatah Al-Sisi had won last month's presidential election with a huge landslide, the EU released a statement saying that the group "expresses its willingness to work closely with the new authorities in Egypt in constructive partnership with a view to strengthening our bilateral relations." It also reiterates concerns about the repressive context in Egypt, saying that the "respect for rights falls short of constitutional principles". In their respective statements, the White House and Downing Street were similarly cautious in the language they used, alluding to the repression of civil society and the opposition, while also congratulating Al-Sisi and expressing their willingness to work with him.

Of course, this is largely due to Egypt's position as a vital regional ally to the west. The country – and, specifically, its military – is seen as a key part of western counter-terrorism work in the Middle East.

While the EU and the US are evidently keen to keep this alliance strong, their protestations about the repressive policies of the government have continually fallen on deaf ears. The EU statement on the election contained several specific criticisms:

"Building a deep and sustainable democracy will only succeed with the establishment of democratic, transparent and accountable institutions that protect all citizens and their fundamental rights. In this context the EU reiterates its deep concern with the continued detention of members of peaceful civil society, political opposition and activists. The EU also reiterates its call on the Egyptian authorities to allow journalists to operate freely; to ensure peaceful protest notably by amending the protest law, to launch independent and credible investigations into the violent events since 30 June 2013; to ensure the defendant's rights to a fair and timely trial based on clear charges; to ensure humane prison conditions in line with international law and standards; to review the numerous death sentences imposed on political opponents in mass trials and to respect due process."

The same day that the statement was issued, Egypt announced that the prosecution in the case of the Al Jazeera journalists would be seeking the maximum penalty: that's 15 years imprisonment for the foreigners, and 25 years for the Egyptians. The case – in which more than 20 Al Jazeera journalists are being tried on charges including terrorism and damaging the reputation of Egypt – has attracted enormous international attention. The UK, US, and EU have all called for the release of the journalists, but Egypt's authorities have held steady.

The timing of the announcement – just as international bodies congratulate Al-Sisi on his win and urge respect for rights – throws into stark relief the limited influence that western powers have in Egypt. This is partly because there is no real incentive for the Egyptian authorities to listen to western allies; military aid, for the most part, continues. Moreover, the government is receiving significant financial support from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates. If, in a worst case scenario, the US or the EU cut off all their support, there would be a clear replacement. Yet, of course, it is highly unlikely that this support would ever be cut off in its entirety: Egypt is simply considered too important strategically. When condemnations are accompanied by statements of willingness to continue to work together, it somewhat undermines the message.

Of course, the decision to pursue the Al Jazeera journalists, Muslim Brotherhood supporters, and secular human rights activists – despite international criticism – is mostly the result of the country's intensely polarized internal politics. The interim government and, presumably, Al-Sisi's new administration, want to suppress dissent. The authorities do crave legitimacy, taking extraordinary measures to ensure a large turn out in the elections, including extending voting to a third day and threatening fines for those who did not vote. Yet despite these efforts, the EU election observer mission found that the election was "free but not always fair" (in the words of Robert Goebbels, Luxembourg member of the European Parliament) given the winner's overwhelming advantage in media attention and finances. The Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has made personal entreaties on behalf of Peter Greste, the Australian Al Jazeera journalist on trial, while Barack Obama and William Hague have also intervened. Yet these, as other criticisms, have fallen on deaf ears. One must question the usefulness of condemnatory statements when they are not followed up by action.

 Link: /www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/africa/11923-the-eus-willingness-to-work-with-egypt-undermines-its-condemnation-of-human-rights-abuses.

Monday, June 16, 2014

Has Al-Sisi turned down Qatari gas in favour of dependency on Israel?

14 June 2014
 Ahmad Al-Laythi
Source: Middle East Monitor

"The Egyptian public can make the calculation that it's happier to have electricity 24 hours a day because they deal with Israel in getting actual gas or they would prefer to be in the dark for some hours a day as a matter of principle," with this statement Simon Henderson of the Washington Institute concluded a documentary broadcast on Al Jazeera on Monday. The film addressed the corruption that marred the gas deal between Egypt and Israel and the role of the military in overthrowing president Mohamed Morsi to protect their economic interests with Tel Aviv.

Even though Egypt halted gas exports to Israel after the January 25 revolution, Tel Aviv discovered at that time massive amounts of gas in the Mediterranean fields of Leviathan and Tamar, enough to cover domestic consumption and export the surplus to neighbouring countries, topped by Egypt whose domestic gas demands exceeded its ability to produce. Moreover, Cairo has become unable to meet its obligations towards foreign oil companies with which Egypt signed contracts to export its share of gas discoveries after the government was forced to direct all production towards the domestic market.

In addition to the huge challenges facing General al-Sisi, the energy problem remains as one of the most serious problems he has to swiftly address. Otherwise he would risk weakening his grip on power in country which ousted two presidents in three years mainly due to instability and poverty.

Israel or Qatar

The drop in domestic gas production has led to a crisis of routine power outages in the country. At the same time, the government finds itself indebted with 8 billion dollars -which is more than half the country's foreign currency reserves. Foreign companies are now prosecuting Egypt and threatening to pull out of the domestic market and to halt their entire production, which would exacerbate the problem at an unprecedented scale. So, what would Al-Sisi do to alleviate this dilemma?

Analysts suggest that he has limited options. More specifically, he only has two options: importing gas from Israel, or Qatar. According to observers, importing from Israel constitutes a direct threat to Egyptian national security, since the Egyptian "energy security" would be fully in the hands of Tel Aviv. Furthermore, this option has another drawback as it would be embarrassing for Egypt, which until two years ago was exporting gas with staggeringly low prices, in flagrant squandering of the resources of the Egyptian state.

According to a report by Forbes magazine, purchasing gas from Israel would be tantamount to "a political land mine", particularly with reports that show that Egypt lost approximately $11 billion due to low-price gas sales to Israel, in addition to another $20 billion losses in the form of debts and liabilities. Forbes quoted Sherif al-Diwany, the executive director of the Egyptian Center for Economic studies, as saying that the ongoing tension between the governments of Egypt and Israel due to those losses will increase the cost of purchasing Israeli gas at a rate much higher than expected.

"In a volatile political situation, its not wise to become dependent on Israel – Al-Sisi will not do it," al-Diwany told Forbes. Egypt relies on natural gas to generate 70 percent of its power.

Gas in exchange for Muslim Brothers?

The second option for Al-Sisi would be to import gas from Qatar, a backer of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. It is no secret that Qatar has become a foe of the new regime in Egypt after the military coup. It has been the main financial backer of Morsi and Egypt's major energy partner. Morsi has signed an agreement with Qatar to build a floating terminal designed to convert LNG to natural gas, and to provide Egypt with five free shipments to help reduce the price of gas cylinders intended for home use. However, after the overthrow of the elected president, Egypt severed its political relations with Qatar, cancelled the agreement, thus losing supply of natural gas necessary to generate electricity. It has also been deprived of the possibility of converting the import of liquefied gas to natural gas to meet its needs.

Despite the political support of Gulf countries -such as Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Kuwait- to Al-Sisi and offering him with free oil shipments, these countries cannot replace Qatar, one of the largest gas producers in the world.

A report by Mid-Africa Time website mentioned that Tariq al-Mullah, the chairman of the Egyptian general petroleum authority, started in April negotiations for the resumption of importing natural gas from Qatar, yet has so far failed to reach any agreement. The website quoted a source in the Qatari ministry of industry as saying that the only condition for resuming talks is "easing pressures on the Muslim Brotherhood and its supporters."

British journalists David Hearst said in a recent article that Morsi was an obstacle to an attractive deal between Egypt and Israel, a deal which is about to be reached, now that Morsi has been ousted.

The Al Jazeera documentary revealed Al-Sisi's secret communications with Israel to insure his political future through importing gas from Israel to cover the deficit in Egypt. The first part of Al-Sisi's plot was implemented last January by lifting the restrictions from foreign oil and gas companies operating in Egypt so they would be capable of importing gas from any foreign supplier, for the first time in the country's history, a move which opened the door for importing gas from Israel.
The Israeli military analysis website DEBKA file said that Egypt will soon start importing 4.5 billion cubic meters of gas annually from the Israeli Tamar field, which renders Israel the biggest gas exporter to Egypt. Nimrod Novick, a former adviser to the Israeli prime minister, said that Egypt, which is facing a number of lawsuits because of its failure to fulfil its obligations towards foreign companies, is currently planning to use the gas deal with Israel to solve this problem first, rather than solving the power outage problem. He pointed out that the agreement may stipulate Egypt's approval to export Israeli gas to the world through the liquefaction plants built on its territory. It seems that Al-Sisi has made up his mind to surrender to Tel Aviv and reject Qatari gas, as if he were telling Egyptians: "Accept Israeli gas or drown in your sweat and live in the dark."

Translated from Arabi21, June 13, 2014

Link:  www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/africa/12114-has-al-sisi-turned-down-qatari-gas-in-favour-of-dependency-on-israel.

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Demonization complicates the crisis not resolves it

22 May 2014
Fahmi Huwaidi
Source: Middle East Monitor

If the effort spent on demonization (of the Muslim Brotherhood) was put towards finding a solution and the development of Egypt, the country would have greatly benefitted from this. Last Sunday, May 18, Al-Ahram newspaper featured a "Brotherhood leader removed from U.S terrorist list" story on its front page. The article's source was the WND website and reports that Senator Chuck Grassley ordered an investigation into a report that the American Department of Homeland Security had removed records from the terrorist list, including records of the Muslim Brotherhood leader Jamal Badawi, also known for his close ties to Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad. He lives in Canada and is a member of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and founder of the Muslim American Society (MAS).

Wikipedia portrays the same man in a completely different light. It says that he is an Egyptian man who is a professor of religious studies and administration in Saint Mary's University in Halifax, Nova Scotia who earned his PhD from the University of Indiana. He has authored several books and articles on Islam, and produces several television programmes aired in Canada and the US. Audio and video copies of these programmes are available worldwide.

He is a great speaker and has a deep understanding of fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) and the history of religions. He spreads authentic information about Islam and Muslims in the West and has almost 350 30-minute lectures on Islam that are popular amongst those studying and following religions worldwide.

The image portrayed by the article in Al-Ahram depicts him to be the leader of a terrorist group closely tied to anti-Israel organisations, while the Wikipedia passage suggests he is a preacher who has dedicated himself to defending Islam and Muslims and is popular and respected in the West.

This matter calls for two comments. Firstly, the article's source (the WND website) is considered to be a platform for conservatives in the US and pro-Israeli, anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. The aforementioned senator was angered by the Department of Homeland Security's clearing of Dr Jamal Badawi's name and removed him from the terrorist list. The only charges made against Badawi were that he is a member of a "terrorist" group according to Egypt's classification and that he has strong ties with anti-Israel organisations.

Secondly, it suggests that Al-Ahram turned a blind eye to the nature of the website and Senator Grassley's position in exchange for the news being utilised to demonise the man in an attempt to settle internal affairs.

This was the same 'bump in the road' faced by the Egyptian media last May when it reported a story about the Free Egyptian Army in Libya and claimed that it was backed by Obama in America, Turkey and Qatar. The story was published by the online newspaper World Tribune.

On April 23 Al Masry Al Youm reported that Dr Manar Shorbaji exposed the newspaper when she investigated them and discovered it was a right-wing newspaper with ties to mafia newspapers. Dr Shorbaji also noted that it had played a suspicious role in representing the views of right-wing American conservatives who opposed Obama purely because of his race and accused him of hating America and secretly recruiting Muslims to the State Department. The newspaper also did not hesitate to describe Obama as a member of the Brotherhood, a communist, and a socialist at the same time.

Although these events raise a number of questions, I am most concerned at the moment by the effort made to demonise one side and a willingness to cooperate with the 'devil' in order to achieve their goal, even if the devil is against all Arabs and Muslims.

Dr Jamal Badawi is fortunate because he has been living in Canada for over 30 years, where the law is respected and the dignity of the people is preserved, but if he were in Egypt, he would be in Al-Aqrab Prison charged with 15 crimes, each of which would warrant his execution.

Yet the story raises the question of how many individuals, who have never been involved in acts of violence or terrorism, have met the same miserable fate that the great preacher has escaped?
According to the Wikithawra independent website, there are over 22,000 prisoners in Egypt.
Brotherhood sources have reported that about 4,000 of these prisoners are facing charges and will be tried in criminal courts (most of whom are from Upper Egypt), and that 10,000 will be tried in misdemeanour courts, most of whom are accused of violating the demonstration law.

If these estimates are correct, this means that the news about the trials will remain a part of the political scene until the end of the year and could even continue until next year. This also means that 8,000 prisoners do not know their fates and their imprisonments are being continuously renewed according to the needs of the current political atmosphere.

As long as this continues, so too will the demonization as it justifies the continuation of the trials and harsher sentences in addition to the renewal of prison sentences. Independent human rights organisations continue to publish reports and testimonies regarding the suffering and misery of those imprisoned.

The demonization campaign is happening on a wider scale than we think, this is obvious if we think about the above matter, and add on the ruling that prohibits the activity of the April 6 Movement, which includes quite a few revolutionary youth groups, in addition to the tension experienced by other revolutionary youth groups. Such tensions include the implications and challenges overwhelming the popular uprising that toppled Mubarak's regime in 2011, the attempts to blur the facts about the so -called June 30 revolution and the law prohibiting demonstrations, which aims to silence repressed voices.

People have also been made angrier by two other issues. Firstly, the return of Mubarak's regimes' symbols and icons and their emergence in public coinciding with the crackdown and oppression of the security forces, suggesting a return to the former regime's policies. Secondly, the media campaign which aims to distort the image of the revolutionary youth and their icons through leaks by the security forces, relayed to some of the counter-revolution platforms who have spread these leaks in an effort to expose the revolution and morally assassinate them.

This picture paints an image of demonization characterized by tension and haunted by fear and anger at the same time. This is because the current clash is no longer between the authority and the Brotherhood, along with its allied groups, but the circle has grown to include the youth revolutionary groups and those who have declared their solidarity with the prisoners and oppressed. The circle has also grown to include the independent human rights organisations that have issued several statements denouncing and condemning arbitrary arrest, torture, and fabricated charges; such statements have been signed by 16 human rights organisations and centres.

We must pay attention to the effort being made to demonise and oppress one side, as there is hardly any effort made to pick up the pieces and reunite the society. Such efforts have not been successful in separating the national opposition forces from the violent groups by distinguishing the radical and moderate forces. This distinction is necessary for the rallying of the nation needed to move towards the future with confidence.

The claims that people accept or reject this are no longer convincing because it would suggest that the people are being taken for fools, as are the security establishment who have actually made the decision and turned the media into platforms from which they launch missiles. These missiles poison the atmosphere and turn things upside down. The people have been taken for fools in a manner that encourages political eradication and welcomes gagging.

After the police and the security forces were acquitted of the charges of killing demonstrators, the oppression doubled and intellectual terrorism added to the civil and social terrorism, making those with different opinions conspirators with the Brotherhood, spies, and part of the fifth column funded from abroad. The mistakes, acts of violence, and crimes committed in the past by several parties were exploited and used to terrorize the community, which led to the closure of the door of politics and the adoption of terrorism as the top priority.

This situation is reminiscent of the events of the French Revolution during which the Committee of Public Security took control of the internal politics of the country and issued a statement in September 1793 declaring that "the time has come for justice to be a priority. It is also time to terrorise and intimidate the conspirators, and therefore it is natural to deal with terrorism as a top priority." The statement ended with the following line, "Let us be in a permanent revolution because the counter-revolution is being hatched everywhere by our enemies. We must let the law hover over the heads of the guilty". This declaration launched the campaign trail that led many to the gallows and prisons.

At the moment, all attention has been focused on the economy, which is certainly an important matter, even though the parameters of the economic vision are unclear, and those that are clear are a topic of controversy and criticism for experts.

In light of the preoccupation with the economy, the security institution remains in control of the fate of mankind and the door of politics remains closed to anyone who is not a fan or loyalist. It is worth noting that the proficiency of a policy is measured by its openness to the opposition, whilst counting solely on loyalists is the first step towards tyranny.

When Field Marshal Al-Sisi was asked for his opinion about the figures and businessmen of the former regime who are pushing their network of interests onto politics his response was that he wanted to pick out the best from each party and did not want to alienate anyone. These are very rational and wise words, but the only problem is that he limits this to economics and it is not applied to politics.

This logic makes for a very difficult equation that is trying to combine economic prosperity and political isolation on the belief that goodness is inherent in those affiliated to the economy and evil stems from the political opposition. Presenting the equation in this formula means that the revolution will continue for a long time and still has many obstacles to face before it achieves its goals.

Link:  www.middleeastmonitor.com/articles/africa/11637-demonization-complicates-the-crisis-not-resolves-it.

Friday, May 23, 2014

Child of a Muslim Brotherhood leader jailed after authorities fail to arrest his father

22 May 2014
Source: Middle East Monitor

 The Egyptian Prosecutor General referred a child of a Muslim Brotherhood leader to a children's court on Wednesday after failing to arrest his father, a London-based newspaper reported.

According to Al-Araby Al-Yawm newspaper, Egyptian security forces broke into the house of MB leader Rafaat Hamed last April to arrest him, but they arrested his 17-years-old son instead after failing to find him.

The prosecutor general referred Hamed's son to a children's court on charges of arming youth protests, which his lawyer dismisses as entirely trumped-up and aimed at pressuring his father, currently at large.

Link: /www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/africa/11643-child-of-a-muslim-brotherhood-leader-jailed-as-authorities-fail-to-arrest-his-father.

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Libyan exile exposes reality of Egyptian support for 'Libya's coup'

21 May 2014
Source: Middle East Monitor

Comments: This article is quoting an individual who is a relative of Ghadafi's and a former member of his (Ghadafi's) regime. It is insightful in that it shows that the pro Ghadafi group is an ally of the Al-Sisi regime. It also shows, indirectly, of the NWO's/ global oligarchy's involvement in the attempts at a coup in Libya. Here is the article:

A Libyan exile has claimed that Khalifah Haftar is making history and restoring dignity to the Libyan Army, even though the government in Tripoli accuses the retired brigadier general of leading a coup attempt. Ahmad Qadhaf Al-Dam , the former coordinator of Egypt-Libya relations under the regime of the late Colonel Mu'ammar Gaddafi, told Libya First TV that Haftar is "resuming" the heroes' jihad. "He is leading the battle with great support from all Libyans and from the children of the Eastern Region, from the displaced in the diaspora, from the supporting sister state Egypt and from the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia," he claimed from his home in Egypt.

Gaddafi's cousin said that he expects that "Libya will return to the bosom of its sons and we shall see the second republic, God willing", in light of the "Battle of Dignity" that is led by Haftar. "Thanks to these heroes, we shall soon crush the NATO revolution and all those claiming to be Islamists."

Haftar's forces, which call themselves the "National Libyan Army", are fighting Islamic battalions loyal to the Libyan Army's joint staff. The Libyan authorities describe this fighting as "a coup attempt" whereas Haftar calls it "a response to a call from the Libyan people and the battle of defending the people and protecting the souls of the officers and soldiers of the Libyan Army who have been killed on a daily basis".

Libyan press reports have linked Haftar's moves against the armed Islamists in Libya to what happened in Egypt when the leaders of the army there, supported by popular, political and religious powers, toppled elected President Muhammad Morsi last year.

However, the Foreign Ministry in Cairo has denied that the Egyptian army supported Haftar's forces in the fighting that took place in the city of Benghazi last Friday and Saturday which left 75 dead and 136 wounded. The ministry denounced what it called "attempts inside and outside Libya to embroil Egypt in the current developments there."

It is worth noting that Haftar, together with Al-Dam, led the Libyan battalion which supported Egypt during the 1973 war against Israel and he led most of the major military exercises that took place in the country. He was also awarded the Golden Star, led the Libyan forces in the war with Chad in 1980 and was promoted to the rank of Colonel that same year despite the fact that Libya lost that war under the leadership of Haftar and suffered many losses. It was during that war that Haftar was accused of perpetrating "war crimes" against the people of Chad.

Link:  /www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/africa/11622-libyan-exile-exposes-reality-of-egyptian-support-for-libyas-coup.